General Osteopathic Council (GOsC) Defence Barrister
I am a leading General Osteopathic Council (GOsC) Defence Barrister specialising in healthcare law and defence. I have gained an excellent reputation for representing and defending doctors facing GMC proceedings. I am renowned for being “hands on”, I give direct and realistic advice and I will not waste your time and money.
I am a leading General Osteopathic Council (GOsC) defence barrister specialising in healthcare law and defence and have gained an excellent reputation for representing and defending osteopaths facing GOsC fitness to practise proceedings.
Mr McCaffrey and his team are beyond excellent.. I cannot thank them enough for their sheer dedication, expertise and efforts which went above and beyond their call of duty in my case.
Due to their hard work and I am now back to work and I cannot thank Stephen McCaffrey enough for his support during my difficult and traumatic time.
Quite frankly, the service they provide is extremely good value. I am sincerely grateful to both of them and cannot recommend them highly enough.
My case was dealt with speed and efficiency, highly recommend the service provided by Stephen McCaffrey
Stephen, I know we have not finished yet but without you I was going to be struck off. I cannot believe how bad my previous advice was and how good the outcome you got for me. I will be telling all of my colleagues. Thank you to you and your team.
I have gained a reputation for being “hands on” giving direct and realistic advice.
Because of my experience in the criminal courts and other adversarial tribunals my special expertise is at contested hearings. However good strategy has meant that more often my clients are not even reaching that stage of proceedings.
I have acted on behalf of osteopaths working in a variety of settings. My experience includes acting for osteopaths on issues of conduct, competence and health.
Contact me today for an initial free and no obligation consultation.
The General Osteopathic Council
The General Osteopathic Council has a duty under the Osteopaths Act to investigate concerns about osteopaths and to identify whether a concern is legitimate and needs to be investigated. Fitness to practise concerns fall within one of a number of categories (or allegations) as defined by law, including:
- conduct has fallen short of the standard required;
- professional incompetence;
- conviction of a criminal offence; and
- serious impairment because of physical or mental health.
GOsC Fitness to Practise Process
The GOsC carries out an initial assessment, called a triage, of every concern it receives to determine whether it falls into one or more of these categories. This initial assessment serves to gather information which is detailed enough to allow a caseworker, an osteopath member of our Investigating Committee, to reach a reasonable opinion on whether the concern is capable of amounting to an allegation.
This initial assessment will depend on the nature of the concern. For example, it might involve an expert report if the concern is about clinical practice, or an assessment by a GOsC medical assessor if the concern is about your health.
The outcome of the initial assessment is then passed to a ‘screener’. A screener will use criteria to decide whether the concern is one the GOsC can deal with. Concerns that would not generally amount to an allegation include:
- complaints about note-taking and record-keeping alone;
- vexatious complaints (these may include if the concern is trivial or mainly intended to harass or annoy, or if there is a personal grudge);
- complaints that relate to employment disputes;
- complaints that relate to contractual disputes; and
- complaints that relate to disputes between osteopaths and patients about fees or the costs of treatment.
If the screener decides that we have the power to deal with the complaint, the case will be referred to the Investigating Committee.
The screener will write a report, which sets out:
- the allegation;
- the relevant osteopathic practice standards that apply; and
- any further information that may be needed.
The committee meets in private and is helped by a legal assessor (a person qualified to give the committee advice on the law) to consider cases on the papers.
If the committee decides that:
- there is a case to answer, a public hearing will be arranged before our Professional Conduct Committee;
- if the matter relates to your health, the Investigating Committee will refer the case to the Health Committee;
- there is no case for you to answer, the case will be closed.
Interim Suspension Order Hearings
In serious cases, where the concern presents a risk to patient or public safety, the Investigating Committee can impose an interim suspension order. While this suspension order is in place, you will not be able to practise as an osteopath. The committee can impose an interim suspension order for up to two months.
The Investigating Committee may also agree ‘undertakings’ with you. Undertakings are binding written promises that you agree to which will voluntarily restrict your practice until the final decision about the allegations against you is made.
Throughout the General Osteopathic Council’s fitness to practise process, there is opportunity for osteopaths to engage and respond. Early and robust engagement is often key to an early resolution to concerns raised.
The GOsC recommends in its guidance that “You should … get your own independent legal advice about the complaint and our request for your response as soon as possible.”
Recent Blog & News
Any criminal conviction will be viewed as proven in a fitness to practise case and attempts at denial could be interpreted as lack insight.
We are pleased to announce the launch of Kings View Resolutions, set up to help and support health and social care businesses with achieving regulatory compliance, maintaining their compliance and dealing with compliance issues arising from the workplace.
If you have previously been registered as a pharmacist with the GPhC, you can apply to re-join the GPhC register.
A voluntary agreement is an arrangement between the GPhC and a pharmacy professional that seeks to allow the pharmacy professional to continue to practise, but with agreed requirements in place.
Pharmacists removed from the GPhC register can apply for restoration after 5 years but must show evidence of insight and remediation.
It was a difficult case which involved untested guidelines written prior to the advent of online services and social media.