The GMC has issued revised triaging guidance where doctors are accused of low-level violence or dishonesty outside their professional practice.
The GMC said
“Given the wide range of behaviour that can be defined as violent or dishonest, this has resulted in a number of cases being concluded with no action or a warning at tribunal as the doctor’s fitness to practise was not found to be impaired.
“We have also reflected on research into promoting and maintaining public confidence in the medical profession. Participants were asked to consider a range of scenarios including where a doctor had punched someone in a nightclub fight and one where a doctor had stolen a low value item from a shop. The detailed findings showed that the vast majority of respondents felt that the GMC should take no action or give doctors a warning for lower-level violence and dishonesty issues that occurred outside the workplace.”
The previous guidance presumed that all allegations of violence or dishonesty would be referred to a tribunal unless there were exceptional reasons not to refer.
GMC data showed that between September 2018 and June 2020, 33 tribunal hearings involving allegations of violence/dishonesty concluded with a finding of no impairment and either no action or a warning.
The guidance now states the following:
Factors to consider
Doctors are among the most trusted professionals and trust is critical to the doctor/patient relationship. In view of this, violence and dishonesty allegations carry a presumption of impaired fitness to practise and therefore should normally be promoted for a full investigation so that the case examiners can consider whether the nature of the allegations are such that the presumption of impairment is rebutted or, if not, require referral for a hearing.
However, the range of behaviours which fall into these two broad categories will vary considerably and the nature of some violence and dishonesty allegations are such that they are unlikely to raise a question of impaired fitness to practise and therefore require a full investigation. The conduct that gives rise to such allegations:
If all these factors are met, the allegations are unlikely to raise a question of impaired fitness to practise and to meet our threshold for investigation.
In addition to the triaging guidance, the GMC has also updated its “Making decisions at the end of the investigation stage” guidance “to provide case examiners with discretion to conclude some allegations of violence and dishonesty with a warning or, more rarely, advice or no action.”
The GMC said “Although violence and dishonesty will continue to carry a presumption of impaired fitness to practise, this presumption will be rebutted where the nature of the conduct is such that the doctor would not pose a risk to public protection.”
GMC Defence Barrister
I am a leading General Medical Council (GMC) Defence Barrister specialising in healthcare law and defence. I have gained an excellent reputation for representing and defending doctors facing GMC proceedings.
- GMC fitness to practise referrals
- GMC fitness to practise hearings
- Appeals against a MPTS Tribunal determination
- MPTS Interim Order hearings
- Appeals against a MPTS Interim Orders Tribunal determination
- Preparing your case before the Case Examiners
- Help with the decision of the Case Examiners
- Help with voluntary removal
- Registration advice
- Appeal against refusal of registration
- Restoration to the Register
- Investigation and disciplinary hearings at work
- Criminal investigation and proceedings
- Police cautions
- DBS [Disclosure and Barring Service] issues
If you have been notified by the GMC that you’re under investigation or are facing difficulties with your registration, contact me today for an initial free and no obligation consultation on 0207 060 1983 or Stephen.McCaffrey@kingsviewchambers.com.